The Full Story

a) Dan Instructed Glory to Raid the Bank Account and hold onto funds for nearly 6 months.  This malicious event caused what is now nearly irreparable harm to our family estate.  If it only impacted me, I could live with this, as I’m able to work hard and build businesses in the future.  The thing that gives me concern is that is has impacted Stella’s and Stevie’s lives and they are just innocent children.  My thoughts are that Dan advised Glory to hold back on these funds as a bargaining chip in the divorce proceedings.  

b) File un-necessary OFP that depletes our marital estate by $15-25k.  My suspicion is that the 911 call and domestic abuse were a pre-meditated strategy by Dan to get me out of the house and gain an unfair advantage in a divorce.  My investigation has revealed an alarming “coincidence” with these events happening with more than a few of his clients.  Since there was already a criminal restraining order, the OFP that was filed was purely strategic and served no other purpose but to gain leverage and put estate dollars into Dan’s pocket.

c) Dan did not instruct her to immediately turn-over all my computer equipment and office files so that business could keep running smoothly.  It was clearly evident that I was supporting our family and that I needed my computer equipment to run my internet business.

d) Dan advised her to fired me from the company that I started with my non-marital assets and was supporting our family.  Setting aside that the trust I once had in my wife was completely violated by this maneuver; both my wife and Dan ignored my repeated warnings of the economic impact of their actions.  They legally tied my hands as I watched $75-100k of cash-flow producing assets drop out of the company.

e) Dan put up roadblocks to keep me from conducting business and supporting my family.  After they restricted me from running Sirulean, they proceeded to send a large number of letters to the legal departments of all the parking companies I do business.  They indicated that I had misappropriated marital funds and restricted them from doing business with me.  In addition to not allowing me to make generate income to support my family through Sirulean, the effectively blocked my ability to earn a living using my non-marital assets. 

f) Refused to negotiate.  At the start of the divorce proceedings I offered Glory 78% of the Marital Estate.  During the very first meeting we had, Scott gave his high-level state of the nation and everyone saw the eventual conclusion of the assets of the marital estate if nothing changed.   I was very clear when I said that I was highly motivated to settle because I wanted to preserve what cash we did have left to support Glory and the children.  Shortly thereafter I followed this up with an offer to settle and give Glory close to 80% of what I thought were the remaining marital assets.  They again refused to negotiate and Dan convinced my wife to pursue a “hardship plea” to go after my non-marital assets through a “hardship” plea.  My understanding of the “hardship plea” is that it usually involves someone who has no means of supporting themselves without this additional support.  My concern about this tactic is how well Glory was advised by Dan on the consequences if they were unsuccessful on this strategy.  Dan is risking the future of my children’s financial well-being.  I cannot believe anyone would advise their client to go down this path if it risks the children’s estate value.   I don’t think that the Glory I knew would risk her children’s future if she knew the true risks of this ploy.  I expect Dan to move onto his next “victim” if his game does not succeed as he has not vested interest in the future happiness of my children.

g) Don’t let me pay contractors for viable pay earned.   Without my assistant Chuck I would not have been able to complete the Domain Sale and manage the portfolio.   Now he knows he is not going to be paid and I have no one to pull reports, renew, transfer, delete, sell, and handle C&D complaints.  Domains are dropping, revenue is declining, and liability is building with no-one handling the steady inflow of legal threats that threaten litigation if we don’t give them back their domains.  This short sighted maneuver is likely to cause the failure and collapse of Sirulean.

h) Dan has constantly made false, unfounded accusations that feed Glory’s mistrust.  I thought that some personal reconciliation might be possible, but it is hard to overcome the constant attack I am under with no means of defending myself against these assertions.

i) Dan has been extremely slow in getting the  restraining order removed.   Even understanding that Glory is pregnant with my child and wishes to discuss the future of our baby, I am in violation of my probation if I offer to help out when requested.   I have been having frequent contact with Glory for over two months and she divulged that she has asked Dan to remove the no contact order , yet still today, it is not removed. 

j) My hands are tied from freeing up equity to make investments that will support my family.  I am afraid to borrow against or list my cabin for sale for fear that I will have something liquid for Dan and Glory to attempt to acquire.  As of today I am cash-starved.   I have less than $1,000 of non-martial cash and desperately need to monetize my equity in my future investments to provide support for both Glory and my children.